This paper addresses the problem of competition vs. cooperation in thedownlink, between base stations (BSs), of a multiple input multiple output(MIMO) interference, heterogeneous wireless network (HetNet). This researchpresents a scenario where a macrocell base station (MBS) and a cochannelfemtocell base station (FBS) each simultaneously serving their own userequipment (UE), has to choose to act as individual systems or to cooperate incoordinated multipoint transmission (CoMP). The paper employes both thetheories of non-cooperative and cooperative games in a unified procedure toanalyze the decision making process. The BSs of the competing system areassumed to operate at the\emph{}maximum expected sumrate\emph{}(MESR)\emph{}correlated equilibrium\emph{}(CE), which is comparedagainst the value of CoMP to establish the stability of the coalition. It isproven that there exists a threshold geographical separation, $d_{\text{th}}$,between the macrocell user equipment (MUE) and FBS, under which the region ofcoordination is non-empty. Theoretical results are verified throughsimulations.
展开▼
机译:本文解决了多输入多输出(MIMO)干扰,异构无线网络(HetNet)在基站(BS)之间的下行链路中的竞争与合作问题。这项研究提出了一种场景,其中宏小区基站(MBS)和同信道毫微微小区基站(FBS)分别同时为自己的用户设备(UE)服务,必须选择充当单个系统或配合不协调多点传输(CoMP)。本文在统一的过程中运用了非合作博弈和合作博弈这两种理论来分析决策过程。竞争系统区域的BS估计以\ emph {}最大期望总和\ emph {}(MESR)\ emph {}相关平衡\ emph {}(CE)进行操作,并与CoMP的值进行比较以建立稳定性联盟。事实证明,宏小区用户设备(MUE)和FBS之间存在阈值地理分隔$ d _ {\ text {th}} $,在该阈值下,协调区域为非空。通过仿真验证了理论结果。
展开▼